SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 175

RUMA PAL
BIRESWAR SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
GIFT-TAX OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DIPAK SOM, MIHIRLAL BHATTACHARYA, P.K.BHOWMICK, SYAMAL DATTA

RUMA PAL, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ application, the writ petitioner has challenged the notice issued under Section 16 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 (referred to as "the Act" ). By the impugned notice, the Gift-tax Officer has sought to assess the petitioner under the Act in respect of the assessment year 1982-83.

( 2 ) THE respondents had disclosed their reasons recorded for the issuance of the impugned notice on December 1, 1987. In that notice, the Gift-tax Officer has said that by an agreement dated March 27, 1982, the petitioner had sold his business which he was carrying on under the name and style of "b. Sarkar Johuri" to a private limited company known as B. Sarkar Johuree Private Limited. By that agreement, the petitioner was to receive a sum of Rs. 3,29,567. 09 being the book value of the petitioner's assets from the company. It is further stated that the petitioner was "interested from both sides" and that consequently the sale was made at a consideration less than the market price. According to the Gift-tax Officer, the value of assets over liabilities was reduced by a sum of Rs. 68,20,761. The difference between the actual consideration and the market value being considerabl














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top