SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 508

BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE, A.K.CHAKRAVARTY
VIDESH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DIPALI BANDOPADHYAY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUNAVA GHOSH, PARTHA SARATHI SENGUPTA

B. P. BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is against the judgment and order dated 24th September, 1992 passed by the learned trial Judge by which the learned trial Judge on the basis of a letter written by the writ petitioner-opposite party addressed to the learned Chief Justice of the court dated 29th April, 1992 granted relief to the opposite party. Kumari Dipali Bandopadhyay instead of filing a formal writ application wrote a letter to the learned Chief Justice of the Court praying for relief against the alleged illegal termination of her service as a Hindi Typist in Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (referred to as V. S. N. L.) and that the said letter written by the petitioner-opposite party was specially assigned by the learned Chief Justice Shri N. P. Singh (As His Lordship then was) whereupon the learned trial Judge treated the said letter as a writ application and called upon the appellant to show-cause. The appellant also filed an affidavit-in-opposition dealing with the case made out in the said letter. The applicant also filed a rejoinder to the affidavit-in-opposition and thereafter on consideration of the entire facts and circumstances of the case the learned trial Judge held








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top