SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Cal) 408

S.K.MUKHERJEE, N.K.BHATTACHARYYA
SAHADEB KUNDU – Appellant
Versus
JOGESH SHEKHAR MUKHOPADHYAY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANATH NATH MONDAL, B.MITRA, Rani Srimal

S. K. MOOKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application is directed against the impugned order, No. 334 dated 15. 5. 91, passed by the learned 3rd Assistant District Judge, Howrah, in Title suit No. 55/1992, rejecting the application of the petitioners herein, under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for adding them as parties in the said Title Suit and for directing the Advocate Survey Commissioner to demarcate the portions of the properties of the applicants.

( 2 ) IN a brief profile, the fact of the case, as delineated in the present revisional application, is that in a partition suit by Sri Jogesh Shekhar Mukhopadhyay and Sri Sasanka Sekhar Mukhopadhyay, opposite parties No. 1 and 2 herein, against their elder brother, Ashesh Shekhar Mukhopadhyay, in respect of 'ka' and 'kha' schedule immovable properties and 'ga' schedule movable properties to the plaint, in the Court of 3rd Assistant District Judge, Howrah, which was registered as Title Suit No. 55 of 1992 in that Court, a preliminary decree was passed, on compromise, on 30th January, 1968, declaring that the plaintiff No. 2, Sasanka Shekhar Mukhopadhyay had share in 'ka' and 'g

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top