( 1 ) - This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 6. 6. 90 and order dated 7. 1. 97 whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the writ petitioners was allowed and the same benefit has been extended to the added respondents and has also been directed to give appointment to the writ petitioners and the added respondents. The admitted fact of the matter is that a panel was prepared in the year 1981. The writ petitioners and the added respondents are said to have been empanelled as no appointment was given to them from the said panel for a long time. They filed a writ petition in the year 1988 praying, inter alia, for the following reliefs:- (A)a writ of or in the nature of Mandamus commending the respondents and their men and agents to forbear from giving any or further effect to the purported order as memo No. 17 Edn. (P)/55-5-85 dated 10. 1. 1985 issued by the Respondent No. 1 and Memo No. 23 (120)/p. E. dated 1. 2. 85 issued by the District Inspector of Schools (P. E.) 24-Parganas inviting the names of the candidates from different employment exchanges for recruitment of Primary School Teachers in different schools in the Urban areas with