SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 520

BARIN GHOSH
SALIL KUMAR ROY – Appellant
Versus
BADU DEVI BHANSALI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.PRASAD PAL

BARIN GHOSH, J.


( 1 ) IN the suit the plaintiff seeks vacant and peaceful possession of flat No. 4 on the 1st floor of premises No. 2, Old Mayor' Court, Calcutta on the ground that the original defendant, Champalal Bhansali, came to possess the property in question under a lease dated 19th September, 1959 for a term of 21 years commencing from 1st October, 1959, but despite the said lease coming to an end by efflux of time the original defendant continued to possess the same.

( 2 ) IN the plaint it has been alleged that one Kanailal Dey and one Kalachand Roy, the then trustees appointed under a Deed of Trust dated 11th May, 1957, granted the said lease. It was then contended in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the plaint as follows :"the said Kanailal Dey and Kalachand Roy were discharged from further acting as trustees of the trust estate and by a decree of this Hon'ble Court in Suit No. 353 of 1974 (Srimati Karabi Roy v. Salil K. Roy) the entirety of the said premises No. 2, Old Mayor' Court, Calcutta was directed to be made over to the plaintiff and the plaintiff became the sole and absolute owner of the said premises. ""after the plaintiff became the sole and absolute owner of the said p
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top