SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 276

MAHEMMAD HABEEB SHAMS ANSARI
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
ANGUR BALA PARUI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEBABRATA BHATTACHARJI, Soumitra Pal, SUKUMAR BHATTACHARYA

M. H. S. ANSARI, J.


( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sukumar Bhattacharyya, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 to 5, Mr. Debabrata Bhattacharjee and the learned counsel for C. E. S. C. , Mr. Soumitra Pal.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the tenant of the premises governed by the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act by which the respondent Nos. 4-6 herein are joint landlords. The petitioner has made an application for supply of electricity to the said tenanted premises and has also complied with the requisite formalities including the deposit of money as directed by the electricity authority in that behalf. The electricity authorities have however not given the connection to the said tenanted premises in the occupation of the petitioner on the ground that an objection has been filed before them by the landlords of the premises.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contended that the statutory duty is cast upon the electricity authorities to supply the electricity to the persons who fulfilled all the requisites and that the same cannot be denied arbitrarily much less on the objection of the landlords. It is also the submission of the lea







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top