SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 276

High Court Of Calcutta
M. H. S. ANSARI
UNION OF INDIA - Appellant
Versus
ANGUR BALA PARUI - Respondent
W. P.  9078 (W)  Of  1998
Decided On : 07/08/1998

Advocates Appeared:
DEBABRATA BHATTACHARJI, Soumitra Pal, SUKUMAR BHATTACHARYA

The main legal point established is that the consent of the landlord is no longer required for electricity supply to a tenant as per the amendment to the Electricity Act.

Headnote:

Electricity Connection - West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act - The petitioner, a tenant, applied for an electricity connection to the tenanted premises but faced objection from the landlords. The court held that the petitioner is entitled to the electricity connection as per the statutory duty of the electricity authorities, and the consent of the landlord is no longer required due to the amendment to the Electricity Act. The court allowed the writ petition and directed the electricity authorities to supply the electricity connection to the petitioner's premises.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a tenant, applied for an electricity connection to the tenanted premises but faced objection from the landlords. The electricity authorities did not provide the connection due to the objection of the landlords.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to the electricity connection as per the statutory duty of the electricity authorities, and the consent of the landlord is no longer required due to the amendment to the Electricity Act. The court allowed the writ petition and directed the electricity authorities to supply the electricity connection to the petitioner's premises.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner, as a tenant, is entitled to the electricity connection despite objection from the landlords.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the statutory duty of the electricity authorities to supply electricity to those who fulfill the requisites, and the amendment to the Electricity Act which no longer requires the consent of the landlord for electricity supply to the tenant.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the electricity authorities to supply new electric connection to the petitioner's premises within four weeks, if necessary by obtaining police protection.

M. H. S. ANSARI, J.


( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sukumar Bhattacharyya, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 to 5, Mr. Debabrata Bhattacharjee and the learned counsel for C. E. S. C. , Mr. Soumitra Pal.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the tenant of the premises governed by the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act by which the respondent Nos. 4-6 herein are joint landlords. The petitioner has made an application for supply of electricity to the said tenanted premises and has also complied with the requisite formalities including the deposit of money as directed by the electricity authority in that behalf. The electricity authorities have however not given the connection to the said tenanted premises in the occupation of the petitioner on the ground that an objection has been filed before them by the landlords of the premises.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contended that the statutory duty is cast upon the electricity authorities to supply the electricity to the persons who fulfilled all the requisites and that the same cannot be denied arbitrarily much less on the objection of the landlords. It is also the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that supply of electricity is a matter between the petitioner and the electricity Department and upon fulfilment of the conditions prescribed therefor, the electricity authorities are bound to supply electricity.

( 4 ) RELIANCE has been placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the case of Ratnamala Dasi v. Ratan Singh Bawa, reported in, AIR 1990 Cal 26 In the said judgment in paragraph 8, the Division Bench observed that by the Amendment Act of 1959 the words "owner and the occupier" in Section 12 (2) of the Electricity Act, 1910 have been substituted by the words "owner or occupier". It was also held that the supply of electricity has now become a matter between the occupier and licensee under the Electricity Act and the landlords as owner cannot ordinarily stand in the way. In the light of the said judgment, the petitioner is entitled to the electricity connection, applied for. However, the learned Advocate for the respondent Nos,. 4 to 6 contended that invocation of jurisdiction of this Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution is not appropriate or proper when efficacious alterative remedy is available to the petitioner under Section 36 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act.

( 5 ) UNDER Section 36 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act where the landlord refuses or withholds his consent of the supply of electricity to a tenant, the tenant has been conferred the right to apply to the Controller for appropriate orders. However, in view of the amendment to the Electricity Act, the consent of the landlord is no longer required, as held by Their Lordship in the said judgment. Therefore, in my view, the petitioner cannot be relegated to avail the remedy under Section 36 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act before invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 226 of the Constitution of India.

( 6 ) THE electricity authorities being State within the meaning of Art. 12, their action can be judicially reviewed by this Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to held that the above writ petition is maintainable.

( 7 ) IT is the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the electricity authorities that it is because of the objection and obstruction by the landlords that the electricity authorities have not been able to give effect to their intention to supply the electricity to the petitioner though the petitioner has fulfilled the condition precedent for supply of electricity.

( 8 ) IN the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed with a direction to the electricity authorities to supply new electric connection to the petitioner at premises No. 50, Kamini School Lane, Howrah Salkia, L. P. No. 301/3/1 within four w


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top