TARUN CHATTERJEE
AMIYA KUMAR BASU – Appellant
Versus
PANKAJ KR. CHAKRABORTY – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS application under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against the order passed by a Revisional Court by which an order of the first Court, allowing an application for addition of party in a suit for partition and injunction, was set aside and the application for addition of party filed by the petitioner was rejected. Feeling aggrieved by the order of the Revisional Court, this application under Article 227 has been moved by the petitioner who made the application for addition of party in the partition suit pending before the trial court.
( 2 ) OPPOSITE party No. 1, Shri Pankaj Kr. Chakraborty, has filed the aforesaid suit for partition and injunction against the opposite parties Nos. 2 to 12 in the Second Court of the Assistant District Judge at Alipore (South 24 Parganas ). In the said partition suit, the petitioner filed an application under Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, upon the allegations that the presence of the petitioner was necessary as he was an interested party in the outcome of the suit as an agreement for sale was entered into by him and one Mr. K. Mohan Das with the opposite party Nos. 2 to 12 in respect of the
REFERRED TO : Shankar Ram Chandra Abhyankar v. Krishanji Dattaraya Bapat
Nagendra Nath Dey v. Suresh Chandra Dey
Atma Ram v. Beni Prasad and Ors.
Narandas Karsonaas v. S.A. Kamtam and Anr.
New Red Bank Tea Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Kumkum Mittal
Sarvinder Singh v Dilip Singh and Ors
Anil Kr. Singh v. Shibnath Mishra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.