SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 466

TARUN CHATTERJEE
AMIYA KUMAR BASU – Appellant
Versus
PANKAJ KR. CHAKRABORTY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEBASIS ROY, JYOTIRMOY BHATTACHARYA, SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJI, SUDHIR DAS GUPTA

T. CHATTERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS application under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against the order passed by a Revisional Court by which an order of the first Court, allowing an application for addition of party in a suit for partition and injunction, was set aside and the application for addition of party filed by the petitioner was rejected. Feeling aggrieved by the order of the Revisional Court, this application under Article 227 has been moved by the petitioner who made the application for addition of party in the partition suit pending before the trial court.

( 2 ) OPPOSITE party No. 1, Shri Pankaj Kr. Chakraborty, has filed the aforesaid suit for partition and injunction against the opposite parties Nos. 2 to 12 in the Second Court of the Assistant District Judge at Alipore (South 24 Parganas ). In the said partition suit, the petitioner filed an application under Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, upon the allegations that the presence of the petitioner was necessary as he was an interested party in the outcome of the suit as an agreement for sale was entered into by him and one Mr. K. Mohan Das with the opposite party Nos. 2 to 12 in respect of the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top