SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 441

SAMARESH BANERJEE
HOOGHLY MILLS COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHASKAR SEN, N.C.ROY CHAUDHARY, P.K.DAS GUPTA, PRANTOSH MUKHERJI

SAMARESH BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) IN the instant writ application,, the petitioners have challenged an order dated 22nd April, 1998 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) disposing of the stay application directing the petitioners to deposit a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs for both the cases within 10 days from the date of receipt of the order as also the order dated 8th May, 1997 rejecting the application of the petitioner to modify the demand order passed by the Superintendent, Central Excise, Range-Ill, Howrah West Division.

( 2 ) ADMITTED the present petitioners have filed two appeals along with two stay applications before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Calcutta, against the two orders of adjudication both dated 8th May, 1997, the petitioners prayed for exemption of such pre-deposit, inter alia, on the ground that the company's financial position is not sound and also on the ground that he has a strong prima facie case.

( 3 ) BY the first impugned order dated 28th November, 1997 the company has been, directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs out of the disputed amount of Rs. l7,43,395/- and by the Second impugned order the petitioners' prayer for modification



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top