SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 455

GITESH RANJAN BHATTACHARJEE, NURE ALAM CHOWDHURY
MD. YUSUF RATHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KAZI SAFIULLA, M.Haque, MILAN MUKHARJI, SANJOY RANJAN PAUL

G. R. BHATTACHARJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In this case charge-sheet however was submitted on 22-6-1998 against the present petitioner and another under Sections 120b / 121/121a/ 124a/ 307, IPC and Sections 10111 /13 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and the learned SDJM Ranaghat took cognizance thereon and committed the case to the Court of Sessions on 25-8-1998 for trial. The case is now pending for trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Nadia.

( 2 ) IT is the case of the State that the petitioner who is a resident of Kashmir is involved in the unlawful activities of Kashmir militants and there are materials on record primafacie showing that he is actively associated with such unlawful activities. The learned Advocate for the petitioner, however, submits that in view of Section 196, Cr. P. C. no Court can take cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 121/121a/ 124a, IPC except with the previous sanction of the Central Government or of the State Government and in this particular case no such sanction has been obtained and yet the learned SDJM, on the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top