AMITAVA LALA
HINDUSTAN CABLES LTD. , RUPNARAINPUR UNIT, P. O. HINDUSTAN CABLES, BURDWAN – Appellant
Versus
APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 – Respondent
( 1 ) A short point is involved in this writ petition. The point is that even after recovery of the amount by the respondent No. 3-applicant/employee as per the terms and conditions of the contract for voluntary retirement, can he restrain the company's quarter beyond the period of two years without leave as a special case on payment of normal rent or not. The need of such retention of the company's quarters is not reflected from any of such documents particularly in view of the fact that the petitioner is admittedly residing at a different place at 26, Padmapukur Road, P. O. Fingapara, Dist. 24-Parganas (North ). The description of such address is given by the respondent No. 3-applicant/employee in the affidavit to support his vacating application being CAN No. 6085/2004 of his own. Under such circumstances, a question arose as regards payment of interest on the gratuity amount to be paid to the petitioner or not. The petitioner recovered his Provident Fund dues to the tune of Rs. 3,01,368/ -. He also recovered his V. R. S. amount of Rs. 4,25,242/ -. So far as the gratuity amount is concerned, the same has been deposited by the company by an order of the competent
Bank of India and Ors. vs. O. P. Swarnakar and Ors.
Gorakhpur University and Ors. vs. Dr. Shitla Prasad Nagendra and Ors.
R. Kapur vs. Director of Inspection (Painting and Publication) Income -tax and Anr.
Shangrila Food Products Ltd. and Anr. vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.