SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 101

S.P.TALUKDAR
DEBASISH DEB ROY – Appellant
Versus
KARUNA DEB ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NANI KUMAR CHAKRAVARTY, R.N.DUTTA, S.BISWAS, SUBRATA ROY KARMAKAR

S. P. TALUKDAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS relates to an application under Article 227 of the constitution of India and it is directed against Order No. 8 dated 13. 06. 2003 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Calcutta in Misc. Case No. 10 of 2003.

( 2 ) GRIEVANCES of the petitioner may briefly be stated as follows: marriage between the parties took place on 15th July, 1992 and it was duly solemnized according to Hindu Rites and Customs. Opposite party/wife during her stay at her matrimonial home was found to be addict and used to consume liqueor regularly. She insisted for separate accommodation knowing fully well that the petitioner is the only son of his parents could not afford to agree to the same. O. P. started torturing the petitioner both mentally and physically. Thereafter, on 10. 04. 1993, she left her matrimonial home on her own and started residing with her parents. Petitioner tried to bring her back but to no avail. His several letters, though received by the O. P. , were not replied to. 0. P. , however, gave birth to a male child in September, 1993 but this was not communicated to the petitioner. Petitioner being left with no choice filed an application praying for















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top