SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 504

P.K.BISWAS
INSTRUMENTATION LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PUSPA DEVI BHARTIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK BANERJEE, BHASKAR GHOSH, SHOVAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY

P. K. BISWAS, J.


( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgement and decree dated 6th August, 1997 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, alipore, South 24 Parganas in Title Appeal No. 133 of 1996 whereby and whereunder the learned 1 st Appellate Judge has affirmed the judgment and decree dated 5. 2. 96 and 15. 3. 96 respectively passed by the learned 2nd asstt. District Judge at Alipore, South 24 Pgs. in Title Suit No. 62 of 1990.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of this second appeal may be summarized as follows :- the plaintiff/respondent filed this suit against the defendant/appellant for his eviction from the suit premises on the ground of reasonable requirement as she was staying at 13, Sarat Chatterjee Avenue, allowed to her husband by the Company that is Gopai Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. , with nine members with great difficulty. The defendant/appellant was inducted into the suit premises of which the plaintiff/respondent is the owner initially at a rental of Rs. 2,000/- per month in addition to a sum of Rs. 600/- for hire of fittings etc. , for three years. Subsequently, after the expiry of the said term, two other agreements were entered into and




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top