SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 369

D.K.SETH, RAJENDRA NATH SINHA
DULAL CHANDRA CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
MONI MOHAN MUKHERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK BANERJI, KAPIL CHANDRA SAHOO, MRINAL KANTI ROY, S.C.SHRIVASTAVA, UDAY SHANKAR BHATTACHARYYA

D. K. SETH, J.

( 1 ) FACTS: This appeal arises out of a judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Fifth Court at Alipore on June 12, 1978 in Title Suit No. 54 of 1974. "this suit was one for partition by the plaintiffs against defendants on the ground that the property belonged to one Pulin Behari Mukherjee, who happened to be the brother and uncle and granduncle respectively of the other plaintiffs. Pulin Behari got the property by inheritance as well as through self-acquisition. It was alleged that the properties were joint and that the defendant nos. 1 and 2, who are the sons of the sister of Pulin Behari, threatened their right, title and interest in the property and that the other co-sharers refused to effect partition. The suit was contested by the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 whereas the other defendants supported the case of the plaintiffs but did not contest the suit though filed their written statements. The parties went to trial and adduced evidences. Question/issues to be decided :"

( 2 ) IT appears that the facts are more or less admitted. The only question that falls for our consideration is as to the interpretation of the character of the deed of family










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top