D.K.SETH, RAJENDRA NATH SINHA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
J. L. MORRISON (INDIA) LTD. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condonation of delay. A preliminary objection has been raised by Mr. J. P. Khaitan that the order was passed by the learned Tribunal at Bombay subject to the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court. The assessment for the concerned previous year reached its finality in another State over which the Tribunal and the High Court of that State had jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of this court cannot be stretched to the Tribunal in another State when the matter reaches finality in the other State.
( 2 ) IN his usual fairness, he had submitted that so far as the assessment for the subsequent years has since been transferred to this State but the concerned assessment having reached finality in another State the transfer of the cases for assessment of the subsequent years will not entitle the assessee to challenge the order of the assessment reached finality in another State, before the High Court of this State. Therefore, this High Court has no jurisdiction. Mr. Khaitan relied upon a decision of this High Court in CIT v. A. B. C. India Ltd. [2002] 255 ITR 108.
( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the applican
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.