SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 735

J.K.BISWAS
A. K. MUKHOPADHYAY, AMIYA MUKHOPADHYAY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GITA MUKHERJEE, MIHIR CHAKRAVARTY, SUCHITRA ROY

J. K. BISWAS, J.


( 1 ) THE petitioner, an inspector in central industrial security force, was punished in a minor penalty disciplinary proceeding, and the decisions given by the disciplinary authority dated August 30th, 1999 and the appellate authority dated January 18th, 2000 have made him aggrieved. He challenges those decisions in this writ petition.

( 2 ) THE English translation of the allegations made in the chargesheet dated July 15th, 1999, issued by the assistant commandant of the petitioner's unit in Hindi, is as under:- cisf No : 871300085 Ins. /exe. A. K. Mukhopadhyay is at present working a Com/comm in A. Coy. On 8. 7. 1999 at about 10-45 hrs. when the Commandant Sri S. L. Prasad was travelling on the Barrage, he noticed a mini bus parked near BPI near National Highway No. 34 near the Security Zone. Inspector/exe. A. K. Mukhopadhyay, despite being near the BPI did not take any action. Upon being asked by the commandant he gave no reply. Considering the present critical situation there is a standing order for extreme caution. Inspite of being a Company commander and despite the mini bus having stopped near the Security zone he had taken no action. Consequently it was th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top