SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 167

S.P.TALUKDAR
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
P. K. COMMERCIAL COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.DAS ADHIKARY, H.TANDON, P.K.TULSYAN

S. P. TALUKDAR, J.

( 1 ) COMMON questions of fact and law being involved in the three cases between the same parties, those have been heard at a time on consent of both sides.

( 2 ) THE Kolkata Municipal Corporation, as petitioner, filed three applications under Article 227 of the Constitution. Those are directed against order dated 01. 03. 2000 passed by the Municipal Assessment Tribunal, (hereinafter referred to as the 'tribunal') in MAA 388a/97, MAA 387a/97 and MAA 384a/97 arising out of the order passed by the Hearing Officer-III dated 11. 03. 1997 in respect of space No. 4a, 4th Floor, 119, Park Street, Kolkata-700016.

( 3 ) GRIEVANCES of the petitioner/kmc may briefly be stated as follows : hearing Officer-Ill after due service of notice and hearing both parties by order dated 11. 03. 1997 fixed the annual valuation (AV) in respect of the disputed case-property for three different periods of time. Opposite party No. 1, M/s. P. K. Commercial Co. and Ltd. , preferred three separate appeals, as referred to earlier. Relying upon the decision referred to by the appellant, in MAA 542 of 1983 passed by Small Causes Court, Calcutta, the Tribunal decided the said appeals. Due to mi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top