SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 181

JYOTESH BANERJEE, PRADIPTA RAY
DILIP KUMAR KARMAKAR – Appellant
Versus
BIJU RANI KARMAKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEBASIS ROY, GURU SADAY DE

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 19th May, 1988 passed by 4th Additional District Judge, Burdwan in 59/85 the Matrimonial Suit No. . By the judgment impugned the learned 15 / 87 judge dismissed the suit in which the husband/petitioner prayed for a decree of divorce against his wife/o:p. , the respondent here on the ground of cruelty.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the case of the petitioner/husband is that the parties to the suit was married according to Hindu Rites on 11. 5. 84 at village payer, the father's place of the respondent. After the marriage the respondent came to the house of the petitioner at Moukhira under P. S. Ausgram and began to live as husband and wife. Within a very short period (as per the allegation of the petitioner a week after the marriage), the respondent expressed to the petitioner that she was not willing to reside at Moukhira and began to press her husband to live at Illambazar. The petitioner did not accept the proposal of his wife because he was brought up by his mother's sister in whose house the couple was residing at Moukhira. At such refusal the respondent/wife became very furious and started to abuse the petiti





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top