MAHEMMAD HABEEB SHAMS ANSARI, SOUMITRA PAL
BONWARILAL GOEL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA – Respondent
( 1 ) UNSUCCESSFUL writ petitioner is the appellant before us. The instant appeal is directed against an order of learned Trial Judge dated april 11, 1983 passed in C. O. No. 5845 (W) of 1977 whereby the writ petition was dismissed upholding the order passed by the learned President of the tribunal which held that the impugned constructions had been erected not only in an unauthorized manner but by infringing several building rules.
( 2 ) IN coming to the aforesaid conclusion learned Trial Judge in the judgment under appeal has noticed that the appellant/petitioner had erected 6th and 7th stories without obtaining any sanction from the Corporation of Calcutta. He had also violated several other provisions of the Building Rules contained in the Schedule XVI of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 in respect of the other portions of the said premises. In the proceeding initiated under section 414 of the Act, 1951 an order of demolition of the 6th and 7th stories had been ordered. It was held by the learned Trial Judge that the two Assessors did not dissent from the finding of fact made by the learned President of the Tribunal that petitioner had constructed the 6th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.