SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 676

JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA
SANJOY KR. ROY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Paresh Kanta Sen

JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA, J.


( 1 ) THE petitioner was appointed as a Clerk in Birati Vidyalaya for Girls on purely temporary basis on a fixed remuneration of Rs. 500/- per month with effect from 17. 11. 1998.

( 2 ) IT appears from Annexure P-3 to this writ petition that at the time of giving such appointment, an assurance was given to the petitioner that his claim for appointment on regular basis will be considered on priority basis when recruitment will be made to the said post of the clerk in accordance with law.

( 3 ) THE petitioner claims that the petitioner is still rendering his service in the said post.

( 4 ) THE petitioner also claims that the petitioner possesses the requisite qualification for the post of clerk. The petitioner also claims that he can also satisfy the other eligibility criteria for the said post.

( 5 ) THE grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is against the school authorities as the school authorities have refused to allow the petitioner to participate in the selection process for the post of the clerk on regular basis. Accordingly, the instant writ petition has been moved by the petitioner seeking direction upon the school authorities for a








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top