SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Cal) 604

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
JAWAR PRASAD SHAW – Appellant
Versus
JHARNA GHOSH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JIBAN RATAN CHATTERJI, SIVA PRASAD GHOSH

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revisional application under Article 227 is at the instance of heirs and legal representatives of a deceased defendant and is directed against order No. 4 dated 18th May, 2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Sealdah in Misc. Appeal No. 24 of 2002 thereby affirming order No. 67 dated 30th March, 2004 passed by the learned Munsif, Second Court, sealdah in Misc. Case No. 48 of 1994 rejecting an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the predecessor-in-interest of the present petitioners.

( 2 ) THE following facts are not in dispute. The opposite party filed a suit being Title suit No. 175 of 1989 in the Second Court of munsif, Sealdah for eviction of one Motilal shaw, the predecessor-in-interest of the present petitioners on the grounds mentioned in the section 13 of the West Bengal Premises tenancy Act, 1956. The said suit was decreed ex parte on 30th November, 1993.

( 3 ) IN the month of April, 1994, Motilal shaw filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside such ex parte decree on the specific ground that the summons was not served upon him
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top