PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, ARUNABHA BASU
SIBNATH KOLEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) ALL the appeals have been preferred from the judgment and order dated 25th September, 2000 passed by the learned single Judge in W. P. No. 8030 (W) of 1999 and the other similar writ petitions, which were heard analogously. The learned Single Judge by the aforesaid judgment and order dismissed all the writ petitions.
( 2 ) ALL the appeals preferred from the aforesaid judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge have also been heard analogously and are disposed of by this common judgment.
( 3 ) THE appellants/writ petitioners are the librarians of Rural/area/primary unit Libraries duly sponsored/aided by the Government of West Bengal. They possess the higher qualification. e. graduate with the recognised diploma in library Science. The appellants/writ petitioners moved the application under article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Hon'ble High Court claiming the benefit of higher revised scale of pay of Rs. 1,3,90-2,970/- appropriate to their higher qualification in terms of the memorandum being No. 33-Edn (B) dated 7th March, 1990 issued by the Secretary, Education Department, government of West Bengal with effect from the
REFERRED TO : Dwip Chand Mund vs. Pravash Kumar Chowdhury
Kunhayahmed vs. State of Kerala
Kunhayahmed vs. State of Kerala
Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Gurnam Kaur
State of Bihar vs. Kalika Kuer alias Kalika Singh
Dwip Chand Mund vs. Pravash Kumar Chowdhury
Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Gurnam Kaur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.