SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 413

PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, ARUNABHA BASU
SIBNATH KOLEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMALESH ROY, Gurusaday Dey, J.L.DE, L.K.Gupta, SANDIP SRIMANI

PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J.

( 1 ) ALL the appeals have been preferred from the judgment and order dated 25th September, 2000 passed by the learned single Judge in W. P. No. 8030 (W) of 1999 and the other similar writ petitions, which were heard analogously. The learned Single Judge by the aforesaid judgment and order dismissed all the writ petitions.

( 2 ) ALL the appeals preferred from the aforesaid judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge have also been heard analogously and are disposed of by this common judgment.

( 3 ) THE appellants/writ petitioners are the librarians of Rural/area/primary unit Libraries duly sponsored/aided by the Government of West Bengal. They possess the higher qualification. e. graduate with the recognised diploma in library Science. The appellants/writ petitioners moved the application under article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Hon'ble High Court claiming the benefit of higher revised scale of pay of Rs. 1,3,90-2,970/- appropriate to their higher qualification in terms of the memorandum being No. 33-Edn (B) dated 7th March, 1990 issued by the Secretary, Education Department, government of West Bengal with effect from the





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top