JAPAN MUKHERJEE
MANCHURA BIBI @ BABY BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL MAJID MONDAL – Respondent
( 2 ) THE petitioner is a divorced wife of the O. P. No. 1. She filed an application under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on divorce) Act, 1986 and on 30. 9. 99 the same was disposed of by the Judicial magistrate, 3rd Court, Krishnanagar granting Rs. 101/- as dower, Rs. 500/-per month for maintenance for iddat period. Then the petitioner filed an application under Section 125, Cr. P. C. for monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1,500/- per month from the O. P. No. 1 from the date of application. The said application was rejected by the learned Magistrate on 20. 9. 03 holding that the petitioner has reaped benefit under Section 3 of the Muslim women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act and law does not permit her to maintenance under Section 125, Cr. P. C. and she can avail of Section 4 of the said Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act.
( 3 ) BEING aggrieved by the said order of the learned Magistrate the wife-petitioner h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.