SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 483

JAPAN MUKHERJEE
MANCHURA BIBI @ BABY BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL MAJID MONDAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KAZI SAFIUDDIN AHMED, Md.Riazuddin, PRABIR MAJUMDAR

( 1 ) THIS application under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code is directed against the order dated 20. 9. 03 passed by learned Chief Judicial magistrate, Nadia in Misc. Case No. 277 (iv) of 2002 under Section 125, cr. P. C.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a divorced wife of the O. P. No. 1. She filed an application under Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on divorce) Act, 1986 and on 30. 9. 99 the same was disposed of by the Judicial magistrate, 3rd Court, Krishnanagar granting Rs. 101/- as dower, Rs. 500/-per month for maintenance for iddat period. Then the petitioner filed an application under Section 125, Cr. P. C. for monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1,500/- per month from the O. P. No. 1 from the date of application. The said application was rejected by the learned Magistrate on 20. 9. 03 holding that the petitioner has reaped benefit under Section 3 of the Muslim women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act and law does not permit her to maintenance under Section 125, Cr. P. C. and she can avail of Section 4 of the said Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act.

( 3 ) BEING aggrieved by the said order of the learned Magistrate the wife-petitioner h





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top