SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 734

ARUNABHA BARUA
ABDUL LATIF MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
ANUWARA KHATUN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Kumar Ghosh, BRATATI DUTTA, Manowar Ali, Piush Chaturvedi, R.Chaturvedi, Sujata Das

A. BARUA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application is directed against the judgment and order date 17. 2. 2001 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bankura in Misc. Case No. 94 of 1996 directing the petitioner (husband) to give maintenance @ Rs. 800/- per month to the opposite party No. 1 (wife) and Rs. 400/- per month for her minor son, in all Rs, 1,200/- per month.

( 2 ) WE may briefly state the facts of the case as follows: anuwara Khatun, O. P. No. 1, petitioner in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bankura, under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for maintenance @ Rs. 1,000/- per month for herself and Rs. 500/- per month for her minor son from her husband, that is the petitioner in this revision, in Misc. Case No. 94/96. The wife alleged that their marriage took place on 18. 6. 92 according to Muslim rites and customs and that the marriage was still subsisting. In the said marriage Den-Mohar was fixed at Rs. 5,001/ -. Gold ornaments, cash money and other things were given to the husband at the marriage. Few days after the marriage, the husband demanded more money and on her expressing inability to fetch the same the husband and the inmates of


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top