SANJIB BANERJEE
UNIWORTH RESORTS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK MITTAL – Respondent
"heard the Parties on CA Nos. 131 and 132/07. Considering the contents of the amendment application and the legal submissions as well plethora of case laws relied upon by the parties as well as Regulation 46 of the CLB, to consider real controversies between the parties and to avoid multiplicity of litigation ! allow the petitioner to amend cp No. 46/2006. Petitioner to file amended petition within a week's time. Respondents to file reply to the amended petition within four weeks thereafter. 'adjourned to 8. 10,2007 at 2:30 p. m. and 9. 10. 2007 and 10. 10. 2007 at 2:30 p. m. ,"
( 2 ) IT appears on a plain reading of such order that the Company Law board did, as it was obliged to, consider the contents of the amendment application. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.