SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Cal) 711

High Court Of Calcutta
Before Mr. Justice Tapen Sen
NOOR EMAM KHAN - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
C. A. N.  5796  Of  2007
Decided On : 09/12/2007

Advocates Appeared:
ALOK KR.GHOSH, DILIP KUMAR SAHA, DURBA BANDYOPADHYAY, Haridas Das, MANAS DAS GUPTA GUPTA, MANIK CH.DAS, P.S.DEB BARMAN, P.S.DEB BARMAN RAJDEEP BISWAS, Rajdeep Biswas, SAHID ALI KHAN

Publication of advertisement for public employment in a local bi-monthly newspaper, giving only 72 hours to the applicants to apply, is not in consonance with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court and violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

Headnote:

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT - SELECTION PROCESS - ADVERTISEMENT IN LOCAL BI-MONTHLY NEWSPAPER - VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 14 AND 16 - SELECTION PROCESS QUASHED.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners, unsuccessful candidates in a selection process for Lower Division Clerk and Peon/Farash/Nightguard/Sweeper posts in the Judgeship of Howrah, challenged the selection process on the ground that the advertisement for the posts was published in a local bi-monthly newspaper, "Juger Khabar", which was not widely circulated and deprived many eligible candidates from applying for the posts.

Finding of the Court:

1. The publication of the advertisement in a local bi-monthly newspaper, giving only 72 hours to the applicants to apply, was not in consonance with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of K.B.N. Visweshwara Rao and Raj Kumar and Ors. v. Shakti Raj and Ors. and violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. 2. The selection process was illegal and irregular as it deprived eligible candidates from having any knowledge of the vacancies.

Issues: 1. Whether the publication of the advertisement in a local bi-monthly newspaper was in accordance with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court? 2. Whether the selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The publication of the advertisement in a local bi-monthly newspaper, giving only 72 hours to the applicants to apply, was not in consonance with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of K.B.N. Visweshwara Rao and Raj Kumar and Ors. v. Shakti Raj and Ors. and violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. 2. The selection process was illegal and irregular as it deprived eligible candidates from having any knowledge of the vacancies.

Final Decision: The entire selection process was quashed, and the respondents were directed to take recourse to a fresh process of selection in accordance with law following strictly the judgments of the Apex Court referred to above and which should include the widest publication including publication in the National Newspaper.

( 1 ) ALL these writ petitions have been heard together. In W. P. No. 11613 (W) of 2007, the petitioner (Noor Emam Khan) has stated that he passed his School Final Examinations in the year 1992 and thereafter, the Higher secondary Examinations in 1995 and the Bachelor of Arts from the university of Calcutta in 1997. He has experience of Typing and Short-hand and he is in possession of valid Certificates. He has stated that pursuant to an Advertisement published on 16. 2. 2007 in the "juger khabar", he applied for being appointed in the post of a Lower Division clerk (Group - "c") on 19. 2. 2007. He subsequently came to learn that the written test for Group - "c" and Group "d" posts in the Judgeship of Howrah had been fixed on 11. 3. 2007. The petitioner has stated that thereafter, he, along with a large number of similarly situated persons/applicants, visited the Office of the District Judge Howrah on 9. 3. 2007 when they were told that Interview Letters had been duly dispatched. With such a reply, they became agitated and thereafter, duplicate Interview Letters were issued to all of them including the petitioner informing him that the written tests for selection of Lower Division Clerks (Group - "c") in the Judgeship of howrah would be held on 11. 3. 2007. The petitioner has stated in paragraph-5 that on enquiry many of the applicants including the petitioner came to learn that their Interview/call Letters did not reach the Post Offices at all.

( 2 ) THE petitioner thereafter appeared in the Written Test on 11. 3. 2007 and according to him, he did extremely well and was expecting that his name would surely appear in the list of eligible candidates for the subsequent process of selection. After a long lapse of time on 28. 5. 2007, the Office of the District Judge, Howrah published a list of those candidates who were supposed to appear for Personality Test on 20. 6. 2007 and 21. 6. 2007. However, the petitioner did not find his name appearing in the said list. He then came to learn that the Selection Committee had selected the candidates by adopting a pick and choose policy and also came to learn that some ineligible and incompetent candidates who had been called for the Personality Test, were close relatives of the staff working under the Chairman of the Selection Committee. The petitioner then made a written complaint/representation on 6. 6. 2007 which was addressed to the secretary, Judicial Department, Government of West Bengal as well as to the District Judge, Howrah but nothing was done. According to the petitioner, the date of publication was 16. 2. 2007 which was a Friday asking the intending candidates to submit their applications in the prescribed pro-forma along with attested copies of documents to the Office of the district Judge, Howrah latest by 5 p. m. on 19. 2. 2007. In the said advertisement, it was also mentioned that no applications would be entertained under any circumstances after 5 p. m. of 19. 2. 2007.

( 3 ) IN other words, the date of publication being a Friday, the only working days that could "have been counted were 3 (three) working days (Friday, Saturday and Monday) Thus, what the respondents actually wanted were duly filled-up applications within 72 hours and that too through publication in a Paper like the "juger Khabar" which, according to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, is only a bi-monthly local News magazine confined in Howrah. According to the petitioner, as has been stated in Paragraph-11, the Newspaper is an almost unknown Newspaper and is not at all a familiar Newspaper even in the Howrah Town.

( 4 ) SIMILAR is the case presented in W. P. No. 11388 (W) of 2007 with the only difference that the petitioner of that case (Suparna Sarkar) has stated that she passed the School Final Examinations in the year 1999 securing 2nd Division whereafter she passed the Higher Secondary examinations in the year 2001 and Bachelor of Arts (Honours) from the university of Calcutta in 2004.

( 5 ) IN























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top