High Court Of Calcutta
Before Mr. Justice Tapen Sen
NOOR EMAM KHAN - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
C. A. N. 5796 Of 2007
Decided On : 09/12/2007
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT - SELECTION PROCESS - ADVERTISEMENT IN LOCAL BI-MONTHLY NEWSPAPER - VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 14 AND 16 - SELECTION PROCESS QUASHED.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners, unsuccessful candidates in a selection process for Lower Division Clerk and Peon/Farash/Nightguard/Sweeper posts in the Judgeship of Howrah, challenged the selection process on the ground that the advertisement for the posts was published in a local bi-monthly newspaper, "Juger Khabar", which was not widely circulated and deprived many eligible candidates from applying for the posts.
Finding of the Court:
1. The publication of the advertisement in a local bi-monthly newspaper, giving only 72 hours to the applicants to apply, was not in consonance with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of K.B.N. Visweshwara Rao and Raj Kumar and Ors. v. Shakti Raj and Ors. and violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. 2. The selection process was illegal and irregular as it deprived eligible candidates from having any knowledge of the vacancies.
Issues: 1. Whether the publication of the advertisement in a local bi-monthly newspaper was in accordance with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court? 2. Whether the selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The publication of the advertisement in a local bi-monthly newspaper, giving only 72 hours to the applicants to apply, was not in consonance with the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of K.B.N. Visweshwara Rao and Raj Kumar and Ors. v. Shakti Raj and Ors. and violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. 2. The selection process was illegal and irregular as it deprived eligible candidates from having any knowledge of the vacancies.
Final Decision: The entire selection process was quashed, and the respondents were directed to take recourse to a fresh process of selection in accordance with law following strictly the judgments of the Apex Court referred to above and which should include the widest publication including publication in the National Newspaper.
( 2 ) THE petitioner thereafter appeared in the Written Test on 11. 3. 2007 and according to him, he did extremely well and was expecting that his name would surely appear in the list of eligible candidates for the subsequent process of selection. After a long lapse of time on 28. 5. 2007, the Office of the District Judge, Howrah published a list of those candidates who were supposed to appear for Personality Test on 20. 6. 2007 and 21. 6. 2007. However, the petitioner did not find his name appearing in the said list. He then came to learn that the Selection Committee had selected the candidates by adopting a pick and choose policy and also came to learn that some ineligible and incompetent candidates who had been called for the Personality Test, were close relatives of the staff working under the Chairman of the Selection Committee. The petitioner then made a written complaint/representation on 6. 6. 2007 which was addressed to the secretary, Judicial Department, Government of West Bengal as well as to the District Judge, Howrah but nothing was done. According to the petitioner, the date of publication was 16. 2. 2007 which was a Friday asking the intending candidates to submit their applications in the prescribed pro-forma along with attested copies of documents to the Office of the district Judge, Howrah latest by 5 p. m. on 19. 2. 2007. In the said advertisement, it was also mentioned that no applications would be entertained under any circumstances after 5 p. m. of 19. 2. 2007.
( 3 ) IN other words, the date of publication being a Friday, the only working days that could "have been counted were 3 (three) working days (Friday, Saturday and Monday) Thus, what the respondents actually wanted were duly filled-up applications within 72 hours and that too through publication in a Paper like the "juger Khabar" which, according to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, is only a bi-monthly local News magazine confined in Howrah. According to the petitioner, as has been stated in Paragraph-11, the Newspaper is an almost unknown Newspaper and is not at all a familiar Newspaper even in the Howrah Town.
( 4 ) SIMILAR is the case presented in W. P. No. 11388 (W) of 2007 with the only difference that the petitioner of that case (Suparna Sarkar) has stated that she passed the School Final Examinations in the year 1999 securing 2nd Division whereafter she passed the Higher Secondary examinations in the year 2001 and Bachelor of Arts (Honours) from the university of Calcutta in 2004.
( 5 ) IN
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.