SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 246

PRAVENDU NARAYAN SINHA, BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
UMA ADDHYA – Appellant
Versus
BIREN MONDAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bratindra Narayan Ray, MALAY GHOSH, SUBHAS CHANDRA BOSE

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for review of a judgment and decree passed by a Division Bench of this Court by which an appeal preferred against the revocation of grant of probate has been disposed of in terms of the compromise between the parties.

( 2 ) MR. Roy, the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant, at the very outset, submits before us that there is an error apparent on the face of the decree sought to be reviewed herein, inasmuch as, an Appellate Court dealing with an appeal against revocation of the grant of probate cannot dispose of such an appeal and set aside the order of revocation on the basis of the compromise effected by some of the natural heirs of the testator. Mr. Roy submits that the learned Trial Judge having revoked the grant of probate on sufficient cause and an appeal having been preferred against such order of revocation, the Appellate Court could set aside such order only on being satisfied that the order of revocation was unjustified. Mr. Roy draws attention of this Court to the fact that some of the heirs of the deceased testator made a compromise during the pendency of the appeal thereby deciding to divide the pr
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top