SOUMITRA PAL
SAKILA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 2 ) THEREFORE, the application for addition of party being C. A. N. 950 of 2006 is allowed subject to such objection that may be taken by the petitioner.
( 3 ) OFFICE is directed to add the applicant as respondents.
( 4 ) NO order as to costs. Re: CAN. 3075 of 2006
( 5 ) PERUSED the application for expunging the name of the Zohara parveen, applicant No. 9, from the application being CAN. 950 of 2006. I find sufficient grounds have been made out by the applicant in support of the application.
( 6 ) THEREFORE, let the name of Zohara Parveen applicant No. 9 be expunged from CAN. 950 of 2006.
( 7 ) THE application being C. A. N. 3075 of 2006 is disposed of.
( 8 ) THERE will be no order as to costs. W. P. 2197 (W) of 2006
( 9 ) THIS writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners praying for a direction upon the respondents particularly the Inspector of Colleges of Calcutta university, the respondent No. 3 to rescind the impugned letter dated January 10, 2006 for conducting inspection of the college concerned on January 28, 2006. T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.