SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 111

ANIRUDDHA BOSE
SUNIL BARAN CHOWDHURY – Appellant
Versus
ANATH BANDHU CHOWDHURY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEBDUTTA BASU, SABYASACHI CHOWDHURY, SUNRIT DEB

ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.

( 1 ) IN this suit, a preliminary point has been taken on behalf of the defendant Nos. 1,3 and 4 as regards maintainability of the suit. Originally Mr. Deb, the learned Counsel for the said defendants had raised this preliminary point under the principle of Demurrer. But subsequently argument was advanced beyond this point, but on the issue of maintainability only. The primary arguments advanced by Mr. Deb in contesting the maintainability of the suit on the ground that this suit was in effect for partial partition, and hence not permissible under the law.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff instituted the present suit on 21st January, 1986 claiming inter alia, partition of a premises being numbered 9, Boys Own Library Row, as well as certain movable properties. The reliefs claimed in the suit included accounts for recovery of sums alleged to he due to the plaintiff in respect of the said premises, and in respect of two firms being run under the name and style of M/s. Chowdhury Printer and M/s. Dipti Industries, both located in the same premises. The written statement has been filed by the said defendants in which counter-claims were made for recovery of certain sums of money.






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top