SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Cal) 9

ARUN KUMAR BHATTACHARYA
ABDUL HAI MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HARADHAN BANERJI, Subhabrata Das, SUBHASISH PACHHAL

ARUN KUMAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THE hearing stems from an application under section 482 Cr. PC filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the FIR being No. 54 dated 01. 07. 98 of P. S. Haroa, North 24-Parganas, pending in the court of Id. SDJM, Basirhat, North 24-Parganas.

( 2 ) THE petitioners' contention as per above application is that on 30. 06. 98 at about 10. 00 a. m. accused Sahid Munshi, Sibobrata Das etc. accompanied by a few henchmen being armed with deadly weapons assembled at Gazitola fishery. Out of them one anti-social element viz Sirajul Biswas threatened the petitioners to dispossess them declaring that even if police personnel come, they would not be spared if the petitioners tried to intimidate them, for which an FIR was lodged on behalf of the petitioners, and Haroa P. S. Case No. 52 dated 30. 06. 98 under sections 148/149/447/435/379 IPC/25/27 Arms Act was started, and the investigation is still pending. Due to flow of accused persons, as the petitioners were scared about loss of their lives and properties, an information was lodged on behalf of the petitioners on 01. 07. 98 with S. P. , North 24-Parganas regarding unlawful assembly of the accused persons












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top