High Court Of Calcutta
Pratap Kumar Ray
KISTO DASI - Appellant
Versus
COAL INDIA LIMITED - Respondent
W. P. 867 Of 2005
Decided On : 03/22/2006
DIVORCEE DAUGHTER - EMPLOYMENT - SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEME - NATIONAL COAL WAGE AGREEMENT-V - MARITAL STATUS OF DAUGHTER - NOT A FACTOR - DISCRIMINATION - ARTICLE 14 - CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - ULTRA VIRES.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's daughter, a divorcee, was denied employment under the Social Security Scheme of the National Coal Wage Agreement-V on the sole ground that she was a divorcee. The impugned order relied on the provision of the agreement that only unmarried daughters were eligible for such employment.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the provision of the National Coal Wage Agreement-V, which restricted the consideration of dependency only to unmarried daughters, was ultra vires to the Constitution of India in terms of Article 14 and violative of Sections 2(d) and 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). The Court struck down the word 'unmarried' as prefixed with the word 'daughter' in the said clause and directed the respondent Coal India Limited to issue a circular accordingly.
Issues: 1. Whether a divorcee daughter can be denied the equal opportunity of employment under the Social Security Scheme due to her marital status? 2. Whether the marital status of a daughter, whether married or divorced, can be a subject-matter of rejection of the application, resulting in the violation of Articles 14, 15(3), 16, and 21 of the Constitution of India? 3. What relief can be granted by the Writ Court with reference to the clause of the National Coal Wage Agreement-V identifying the availability of the benefit only to the unmarried daughter? 4. Whether the economic potentiality of the petitioner's daughter, as raised by submitting the availability of 'denmohor' after divorce, can be agitated by setting up a new ground, which was not factually determined and proved? 5. What relief can be granted?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Marital status of a daughter, whether married or divorced, cannot be a factor in determining her eligibility for employment under the Social Security Scheme. 2. The provision of the National Coal Wage Agreement-V, which restricted the consideration of dependency only to unmarried daughters, was discriminatory and arbitrary, and violated the principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in the Constitution of India and international conventions. 3. The word 'unmarried' as prefixed with the word 'daughter' in the said clause was ultra vires to the Constitution of India and was struck down.
Final Decision: The impugned order rejecting the petitioner's daughter's application for employment was set aside and quashed. The respondents were directed to consider her case de novo on the economic standpoint by identifying her economic condition and factor of dependency upon her mother within one month and pass a reasoned decision.
( 1 ) IN this writ application the impugned order dated 12th June, 2002 issued by Personal Manager (Employment) of Eastern Coalfields Limited, Sanctoria, p. 0. Disergarh, Dist. Burdwan as addressed to the Secretary of Koyala Mazdoor congress, Sanctoria No. 9 Colliery is under challenge. By the said impugned order annexed at page 30 of the writ application the appointment of petitioner no. 2, Smt. Hamida Khatoon, daughter of petitioner No. 1 under the Social security Scheme in terms of provision of National Coal Wage Agreement-V providing job to the dependent of an employee who has been declared as physically unfit to work was rejected only on the ground that the petitioner No. 2 was the divorcee daughter and hence was not attracted under the clause of the said agreement for consideration of her case. The factual matrix of applicability of Social Security Scheme under the National Coal Wage Agreement-V and the fact that the petitioner No. 1 due to medically unfit to work accrued right to pray for job of a dependant, are not under challenge but those are admitted and undisputed.
( 2 ) ONLY consideration accordingly arise in this writ application as to whether the divorcee daughter could be denied the benefit of employment, though under the National Coal Wage Agreement-V aforesaid, the marital status of a son is not at all the subject-matter of consideration, namely, married or divorcee or unmarried while deciding the issue of appointment applying said scheme. In the case of a daughter only it is stipulated in the said agreement that she must be unmarried to avail the benefit of appointment in the event of the employee being medically unfit to work upon whom she is dependent. Under the National coal Wage Agreement-V, there is no provision for appointment of divorcee daughter. In this writ said National Coal Wage Agreement-V is under challenge on the ground that the provision of non-consideration of divorcee daughter on the reflection of keeping the provision of such appointment to a son of the employee concerned irrespective of his marital status, is ultra vires to the constitution leading to sex discrimination and thereby violates Article 14 of the constitution of India.
( 3 ) THE relevant provision of the National Coal Wage Agreement-V reads to this effect: -"9. 4. 0 Employment to one dependant of a worker who is permanently disabled in his place: i) The disablement of the worker concerned should arise from injury or desease, be of a permanent nature resulting into loss of employment. and it should be so certified by the Coal company concerned. ii) In case of disablement arising out of general physical debility so certified by the Coal Company, the employee concerned will be eligible for the benefit under this clause if he/she is upto the age of 58 years. A joint committee will be constituted by the JBCCI for considering as to what constitutes general physical debility referred to hereinabove. This committee will submit its report by 31. 03. 1996. In case of difference of opinion the matter will be referred to JBCCI which may appoint an Umpire to decide the issue. The decision of ihe Umpire shall be binding on the parties. iii) The dependant for this purpose means the wife/husband as the case may be unmarried daughter, son and legally adopted son. If no such direct dependant is available for employment younger brother, widowed daughter/widowed daughter-in-law or son-in-law residing with the employee and almost wholly dependent on the earning of the employees may be considered. In so far as female dependants are concerned, their employment would be governed by the provisions of Clause 9. 5. 0. iv) The dependants to be considered for employment should be physically fit and suitable for employment and aged not more than 35 years provided that the age limit in case of employment of female spouse would be 45 years as given in Clause 9. 5. 0. In so far as male spouse is concerned, there would be no age limit r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.