SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 257

ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE
PRADIP KUMAR MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
SSK BROKING SERVICES PVT. LTD – Respondent


A. K. BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has share transactions in respect of listed shares with a stock broker being the respondent No. 1 above-named. There had been disputes and differences between the parties, the petitioner approached Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI)for redressal of his grievance. SEBI advised him to approach the national Stock Exchange. Accordingly, the petitioner approached the national Stock Exchange. The National Stock Exchange advised him to lodge his complaint in the form of a claim application and choose one of the arbitrators from their panel for resolving the disputes by way of arbitration in accordance with the bye laws of the Stock exchange. The petitioner had chosen five names from the panel. Similarly, the stock broker also did the same thing. The Stock exchange found one Mr. P. K. Sanyal common in both the panels and as such Mr. Sanyal was appointed arbitrator as chosen by both the parties. Mr. Sanyal did not incline to act as arbitrator. The Stock exchange finding no other alternative appointed one Mr. Ajoy Agarwal, who was the lone member left in the panel not chosen by any of the parties. Mr. Agarwal accordingly entered appearance. The























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top