SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 567

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, TAPAN KUMAR DUTT
JAYANTA KUMAR SIKDAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIKASH GOSWAMI, DEBASHIS SARKAR, SUBRATA MUKHOPADHYAY, Subrata Saha Roy

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed challenging the order of the State Administrative Tribunal dated 17. 01. 2002 by which o. A. No. 1438 of 1997 filed by the writ petitioner was dismissed.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts of the case are that an order of suspension was issued against the petitioner by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Special Bench, in contemplation of a departmental proceeding. Thereafter, on 20th June, 1996, the petitioner was directed to attend the office regularly and the suspension order was virtually withdrawn. The petitioner was thereafter served with a chargesheet alleging misconduct and the petitioner was directed to state in writing within seven days from the date of receipt of the chargesheet whether the petitioner would accept the charges in full or in part or whether the petitioner would like to face an enquiry in respect of those charges. After time was extended to the petitioner to give reply to the charges, the petitioner gave a reply denying the charges and in the said reply the petitioner wanted supply of some documents which were relied on in the chargesheet. The petitioner also made a prayer for engaging an Advocate for de



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top