SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 83

P.N.SINHA
SHIBNATH MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIT BHATTACHARJI, KIRAN SHAH, MALA SEN, S.S.ROY, SILADITYA BANERJEE

P. N. SINHA

( 1 ) THIS revisional application under Section 482 of Cr. P. C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing complaint case No. C-661 of 2002 under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code (in short I. P. C.) now pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (in short CJM), barasat and the order dated 16. 9. 02 passed by the learned CJM issuing process against the petitioners and another accused.

( 2 ) THE aforesaid complaint case was started on the basis of complaint lodged by O. P. No. 2 as complainant in the Court of the learned CJM against these petitioners and another accused. It was the allegation of complainant that on the basis of an advertisement in 'bartaman' Bengali Daily newspaper dated 21. 2. 99 a marriage negotiation between Pranabesh Bagchi, son of complainant and Petitioner No. 2 Mohua Bagchi nee Mukherjee was made and in the newspaper the advertisement was published as 'quick marriage, east Bengal Mukherjee, 20/5'i" Class X standard, really beautiful, expert in household works, father Central Government employee, no objection in business'. During negotiation the petitioner No. 1, father of the bride told that his daughter is
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top