Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta

( 1 ) THE plaintiff/state Government has filed this suit for a decree of declaration that the ex parte decree dated 22nd July, 1986 passed in Suit no. 367 of 1985 is void and/or voidable, inoperative and not binding on the plaintiff, and further that the registered conveyance dated 10th January 1989 executed by the Registrar Original Side of this Court in favour of the defendant No. 1 pursuant to this decree is void ab initio, illegal, inoperative and not binding upon the plaintiff and also delivery of and cancellation of the said conveyance. Decree for perpetual injunction restraining the defendant Nos. 1 (a), 1 (b), 1 (c), 1 (d) and 2 and each of them, their servants, agents, representatives and assignees from acting upon and/or giving effect, or relying on the said decree. The other incidental reliefs are also claimed. This suit was originally filed, seeking relief originally against one radheshyam Agarwal, since deceased and predecessor-in-interest of the present defendant Nos. 1 (a)-1 (d ).

( 2 ) THE original plaintiff obtained an ex parte decree which is sought to be impugned here, for specific performance of an agreement for sale of the Sonali Tea Esta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document