BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, RAJENDRA NATH SINHA
HEILGUS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS first miscellaneous appeal is at the instance of plaintiff in a suit for declaration and injunction and is directed against Order No. 3 dated 23rd April, 2004 passed by the learned Judge-in-charge, 7th Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta, in Title Suit No. 461 of 2004 thereby refusing the prayer of ad interim injunction on an application under order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the appellant. By the said order, the learned Trial Judge merely issued notice upon defendants to show-cause why the prayer of the plaintiff for temporary injunction should not be granted.
( 2 ) THE appellant filed in the City Civil Court at Calcutta the aforesaid suit being Title Suit No. 461 of 2004 thereby praying for the following relief: (a) Declaration that the defendants has got no right to deny the right of the plaintiff as a tenant in respect of the tenanted premises and/or in respect of the equivalent space to be constructed in the building at the premises aforesaid; (b) Permanent injunction restraining the defendants from demolition and/ or destruction and/or changing the nature of the building, and/or the tenanted premises; (c) Per
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.