ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, V.S.SIRPURKAR
PRASANTA BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 04. 09. 1998 passed by a learned Judge of the Writ Court whereby the learned Judge dismissed the writ petition holding, inter alia, that the extension of probationary period of the writ petitioner depends upon the satisfaction of the employer. Detailed facts are as follows : pursuant to an advertisement in Aajkal, a daily Bengali newspaper, for filling up the posts of trainee Inspector of General Insurance Marketing, the writ petitioner applied and he was interviewed by the employer and sent on training. On successful completion of his training, the petitioner was appointed by Oriental Insurance Company (hereinafter called 'the said Company) as a probationary Development Officer by a provisional appointment letter dated 20. 05. 87. Subsequently another appointment letter was issued on 12. 06. 87, containing the terms of appointment. One of the terms was that the petitioner will be on probation for a period of 12 months which may be extended at the discretion of the employer for a further period not exceeding 12 months. Clause 4 of the Terms and Conditions on which emphasis was placed by the lea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.