SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 216

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, V.S.SIRPURKAR
PRASANTA BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ABDUZ HADI, Ashis Kumar Sanyal, M.B.SARKAR, MIHIR KR.KUNDU

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 04. 09. 1998 passed by a learned Judge of the Writ Court whereby the learned Judge dismissed the writ petition holding, inter alia, that the extension of probationary period of the writ petitioner depends upon the satisfaction of the employer. Detailed facts are as follows : pursuant to an advertisement in Aajkal, a daily Bengali newspaper, for filling up the posts of trainee Inspector of General Insurance Marketing, the writ petitioner applied and he was interviewed by the employer and sent on training. On successful completion of his training, the petitioner was appointed by Oriental Insurance Company (hereinafter called 'the said Company) as a probationary Development Officer by a provisional appointment letter dated 20. 05. 87. Subsequently another appointment letter was issued on 12. 06. 87, containing the terms of appointment. One of the terms was that the petitioner will be on probation for a period of 12 months which may be extended at the discretion of the employer for a further period not exceeding 12 months. Clause 4 of the Terms and Conditions on which emphasis was placed by the lea



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top