SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 331

NARAYAN CHANDRA SIL
RABINDRA NATH PAL – Appellant
Versus
SUBODH CHANDRA HALDER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIT KUMAR RAKSHIT, BARUN ROY CHOUDHURY, Dipankar Haider

Narayan Chandra Sil

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 5. 7. 2003 passed by Sri B. Mondal, the learned Additional District Judge, Alipore, South 24-Parganas in Title Appeal No. 183 of 2002 affirming the judgment and decree dated 7. 5. 2002 passed by Sri S. K. Manna, the learned Civil Judge, Junior division, 1 st Court, Alipore in connection with Title Suit No. 4 of 2002.

( 2 ) THE suit filed by the plaintiff is for eviction of the tenant and for mesne profit. The plaintiff's case in brief is that he is the owner of the suit property. The defendant was inducted as a monthly tenant by virtue of tenancy agreement dated 28. 10. 1985 together with another agreement dated 29. 10. 1986. The said tenancy was in existence from 28. 10. 1985 and had expired on 31. 10. 1997. The tenant did not vacate the suit premises despite the expiry of the term of agreement. Besides the plaintiff has brought the ground of damage of the suit property at the instance of the defendant. And so the suit is for eviction and mesne profit.

( 3 ) THE defendant contested the suit by filing a written statement in which all the material-allegations are denied and it is inter alia sta





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top