SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 333

NARAYAN CHANDRA SIL
SOVAN SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
PAMPA SARKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIKASH RANJAN BHATTACHARJI, P.C.PAL CHAUDHARY, RUPA BANDHYAPADHAYA, S.SEN, SAMRAT SEN

Narayan Chandra Sil

( 1 ) THIS revisional application under Article 227 of the Constitution of india is directed against the Order No. 28 dated 7. 8. 2004 passed by Shri K. K. Dey, the learned Additional District, 13th Court at Alipore in Matrimonial suit No. 49 of 2003.

( 2 ) ACTUALLY a Matrimonial Suit was filed by the o. p. /wife for divorce and in that suit an application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act was filed for the alimony pendente lite. The petitioner/husband appeared before the trial Court and filed an application for dismissal of the suit on the grounds stated therein particularly in view of the fact that the petitioner had already obtained a decree for divorce against the o. p. from the Court of United kingdom and as such the marriage has already been dissolved.

( 3 ) AFTER hearing both the parties the learned Trial Judge was pleased to reject the application holding that the ex parte decree passed by the learned District Judge, Illford County Court is not binding upon the o. p. /wife. Against that order the present revisional application has been filed.

( 4 ) THE revisional application is contested by the wife by filing affidavit-in-opposition in which all















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top