SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Cal) 722

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
The Honble Justice Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay And The Honble Justice Kishore Kumar Prasad
CHAINBANU KHATUN
VS.
STATE OF WEST BENGAL
M. A. T. 368 of 2009
Decided On: SEPTEMBER 09, 2009

Advocates Appeared: AMAL BARAN CHATTERJEE, DAISY BASU, FAZLUL HAQUE, Hirak Mitra, M.R.ABEDIN, MILAN CHANDRA BHATTACHARYA, NURE ZAMAN

Convening a meeting is not synonymous with holding a meeting in the context of the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993, and the West Bengal Municipalities (Procedure and Conduct of Business) Rules, 1995.

Headnote:

CONVENING A MEETING - MEANING AND INTERPRETATION - WEST BENGAL MUNICIPAL ACT, 1993 - WEST BENGAL MUNICIPALITIES (PROCEDURE AND CONDUCT OF BUSINESS) RULES, 1995 - Whether convening a meeting will mean holding of the same - Held, convening and holding of the meeting will have identical meaning in relation to various provisions of the Act and Rules.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants, Councillors of Dhulian Municipality, challenged the right, authority, and jurisdiction of three Councillors to issue a notice calling a special meeting of the Board of Councillors to discuss and adopt a resolution for the removal of the Chairman, when the Vice-Chairman had already issued a notice convening a special meeting.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that convening a meeting and holding of the same cannot have identical meaning, as per Rule 7(2) of the West Bengal Municipalities (Procedure and Conduct of Business) Rules, 1995. Convening a meeting is a necessary step before holding a meeting, and a meeting can be duly held only after it is duly convened.

Issues: 1. Whether convening a meeting is synonymous with holding a meeting in the context of the West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993, and the West Bengal Municipalities (Procedure and Conduct of Business) Rules, 1995. 2. Whether the three Councillors had the authority to convene a special meeting when the Vice-Chairman had already issued a notice convening a special meeting.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted the terms "convene" and "hold" as used in the Act and Rules and held that they do not have identical meanings. Convening a meeting is a necessary step before holding a meeting, and a meeting can be duly held only after it is duly convened. 2. The court held that the three Councillors did not have the authority to convene a special meeting when the Vice-Chairman had already issued a notice convening a special meeting in compliance with Rule 9(3)(b)(ii) of the Rules.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge, and declared the resolutions adopted in the meeting held on 20th August 2008 pursuant to the notice dated 11th August 2008 issued by the Vice-Chairman as valid, operative, and to be given effect to forthwith.

PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J.

( 1 ) THE only question that falls for consideration in this appeal is whether convening a meeting will mean holding of the same. In other words, convening and holding of the meeting will have identical meaning in relation to various provisions of West Bengal municipal Act, 1993 and West Bengal Municipalities (Procedure and conduct of Business) Rules, 1995.

( 2 ) THE appellants herein are the Councillors of Dhulian municipality who filed the writ petition challenging the right, authority and jurisdiction of the three Councillors to issue notice on 14th August, 2008 calling a special meeting of the Board of Councillors of the said Dhulian Municipality on 19th August, 2008 for the purpose of discussions and also to adopt resolution for removal of the Chairman of the said Municipality, when the vice-chairman of the said Municipality had already issued notice on 11th August, 2008 convening the special meeting on 20th August, 2008 in terms of Rule 9 (3) (b) (ii) of the West Bengal municipalities (Procedure and Conduct of Business) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the said Rules, 1995 ).

( 3 ) THE learned Single Judge finally disposed of the writ petition on 8th April, 2009, holding that on failure of the chairman, the Vice-chairman of the said Municipality also failed to call the special meeting, pursuant to the request of the requisitionists, within the prescribed period as provided in Rule 9 (3) (b) (ii) of the said Rules, 1995 and the three Councillors had correctly exercised their rights under Rule 9 (3) (b) (iii) by calling the special meeting on 19th August, 2008.

( 4 ) ASSAILING the aforesaid judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge, the instant appeal has been preferred. Undisputedly, the requisitionists served a notice on 22nd july, 2008 upon the Chairman of the Municipality to convene a special meeting of the Board of Councillors for discussion and to adopt a resolution for removal of the said Chairman. On failure of the Chairman, the Vice-chairman of the said Municipality by the notice dated 11th August, 2008 convened a special meeting on 20th august, 2008 to discuss the no confidence motion as mentioned in the letter of the aforesaid requsitionists dated 22nd July, 2008. A copy of the said notice was also forwarded to the District magistrate, Murshidabad for information by the Vice-chairman. Three Councillors of the Dhulian Municipality also issued a notice on 14th August, 2008 convening a special meeting on 19th august, 2008 for discussion and to adopt a resolution for removal of the Chairman of the said Municipality. By the aforesaid notice, all the Councillors were requested to attend the said special meeting. The said notice dated 14th August, 2008 issued by the three Councillors is set out hereunder:

NOTICE


Memo No. 01 (19)/d. M. / (camp office) Dated:14. 08. 08


To all Councillors-Sl. No.

Councilors Name

Designation

Ward No.


1.

Majahar Hossain

Councilor

1


2.

Hasnara Bibi

do

2


3.

Rahena Yeasmin

do

3


4.

Amrul Mahaldar

do

4


5.

Dilip Sarkar

do

5


6.

Sampa Das

do

6


7.

Prasanta Sarkar

do

7


8.

Safar Ali

do

8


9.

Chen Banu Khatun

Chairman ( Dhuliyan Municipality )

9

10.

Sundar Kumar Ghosh

Councilor

10


11.

Yeasin Sk.

do

11


12.

Afrin Bibi

do

12


13.

Mansur Ali

do

13


14.

Md. Badrul Sk.

do

14


15.

Majeda Bibi

do

15


16.

Bhagya Nath Das

do

16


17.

Shib Shankar Singha

Vice-Chairman ( Dhuliyan Municipality )

17

18.

Asiya Bibi

Councilor

18


19.

Nirmal Kumar Jain

do

19



As Chairman and Vice-Chairman of Dhuliyan municipality failed to convene Special meeting on the requisiton signed by councillors dt. 22. 07. 2008 and as per provision of rule 9 (3) (b) (iii) Chapter III of (West Bengal Municipalities (Procedure & Conduct of Business) Rules, 1995, We, the following councillors request you to attend the special meeting to be held on dt. 19-08-08 at 11:00 A. M. in Dhuliyan Municipal Office to discuss the following Agenda. Agenda-Discussion and to adopt resolution for removal of Chairman of D















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top