TAPAN KUMAR DUTT, SYAMAL KANTI CHAKRABARTI
Subhra Sinha Roy – Appellant
Versus
Iman Kalyan Dey – Respondent
Syamal Kanti Chakrabarti, J.
The present application is filed for the review of the judgment dated 27.07.2007 passed in F. A. No. 10 of 2005 dismissing the appeal preferred by the plaintiff/ appellant against the judgment and decree of dismissal dated 15.06.2004 passed in Title Suit No. 2044 of 1997 by the learned Judge, 10th Court City Civil Court, Calcutta.
2. In the Court below the plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 2044 of 1997 praying or a decree for mandatory injunction directing the defendant/ opposite party to remove and/or dismantle the staircase on the common passage at the cost of the defendant as per the terms of settlement in a compromise decree passed by this Hon’ble Court in a Partition Suit No. 646 of 1960.
3. One Sephali Patra filed the above suit against one Lilabati Dashi for partition of premises no. 63, Shyambazar Street, formerly known as no. 111/1 Shyambazar Street, in the Original Side of this Hon’ble Court. The said Lilabati Dashi was substituted by her descendants Kartick Chandra Pal and Harinarayan Dey. The said suit ended in a compromise decree on 01.10.1962 in terms of which Sephali Patra got the back portion of the said premises together
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.