SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Cal) 394

SOUMITRA PAL
Mangalmoy Bandyopadhyay – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:Partha Sarathi Bhattacharjee, S.P. Jana, Samiran Mondal, Soumik Ganguyl, Advocates.

JUDGMENT:-

(1) IN these writ petitions prayers have been made to declare Rule 8 (5) (a) and 8 (5)(b) of the West Bengal Schools (Recruitment of Non-teaching staff) Rules, 2005 (rules for short) as ultra vires the Constitution of India on the ground that it offends Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India as it restricts or limits the choice of selection of the candidates sponsored through the medium of Employment Exchange. Prayers are for a direction upon the respective school authorities to allow the petitioners to participate in the interviews to the post of Group-D post along with ail other candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange since allegedly the school authorities have refused to allow them to participate in the selection process in view of Rule 8 (5) (a) and 8 (5) (b) of the Rules.

(2) THE Issue is whether the name of a candidate who has not been sponsored by the employment exchange can be permitted to appear in the interview. Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that in view of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and the law laid down in the judgments of the Apex Court it is not open to the State to impose such restriction on the field of cho









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top