SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Cal) 1084

PARTHA SAKHA DATTA
Daruari Industries – Appellant
Versus
President of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:A.K. Roy, P.R. Mitra, S. Basu, N. Mukherjee, Advocates.

JUDGMENT:-

(1). An Arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 made an arbitration in terms of arbitration clause in the agreement over disputes between the parties in respect of execution of the agreement entered into by and between the parties on 14th March, 2001. An award was passed which according to the Union of India is vitiated by partial attitude of the arbitrator, and that it was decided ex parte. Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act an appeal was preferred by the opposite party against the award. Since the appeal was time barred an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was taken out by the petitioner before the learned Additional District Judge, 6th Court, Alipore.

(2). The learned Additional District Judge by an order dated 26th of July, 2006 allowed the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1,500/- Before the learned Judge in the Court below the opposite party took out the plea that there was 60 days delay in preferring the appeal and since the Government machinery did not run speedily there was delay in preferring the appeal against the award which is vitiated by non-adherence


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top