DIPANKAR DATTA, J.

(1.) The broad is, sues raised in the writ petitions, registered as W.P. Nos. 208, 5302 (W), 5743(W), 5744(W) and 18189(W), all of 2001 being identical to the issue involved in MAT No. 275 of 2008, a learned single Judge of this Court by diverse orders have referred the same to the Division Bench for analogous hearing. The writ petitions have since been heard along with the writ appeal referred to above and all the proceedings shall stand concluded by this common judgment.

(2.) The facts of each case may now "be noticed. In the writ appeal preferred by the University of Calcutta (hereafter the University) and its officers, judgment and order dated 28-3-2008 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court allowing W.P. No. 22176 (W) of 2007 is the subject-matter of challenge. The facts giving rise to the writ petition is that the petitioner, Pritam Rooj (hereafter Pritam) had taken the B.Sc. Part II (Three Year Honours) Examination, 2007 conducted by the University. Although Pritam was successful in clearing the examination, he was dissatisfied with the marks awarded to him in respect of Papers V and VI. He obtained 28 and 36 marks respectively out of a