Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.

1. THESE three matters have been assigned to this Bench by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of which the first one has been assigned as a consequence of reference by a Division Bench of this Court dated 17th March, 2008 passed in F.M.A. No.768 of 2007 and the other two matters have been referred to by another Division Bench before whom these two writ-applications were assigned on the request of two learned Single Judge of this Court because of importance of the question involved. The said Division Bench was, however, of the view that since the other one, namely, the case of Tulsi Roy, has already referred to a larger bench, these two writ- applications should also be heard along with the same. Consequently, these two writ-applications have also been assigned before us.

2. WE have heard all these three matters together as the points involved in all these three matters are substantially the same. In the case of Tulsi Roy (Supra), for the purpose of appointment of a clerical staff, The concerned school took prior permission of the District Inspector of Schools and asked the employment exchange to sponsor the names of the eligible candidate. Accordingly, the na