PRATAP KUMAR RAY, MRINAL KANTI CHAUDHURI
Kenaram Biswas – Appellant
Versus
Nadia Gramin Bank – Respondent
Pratap Kumar Ray, J.
1. THE Judgment of the Court was delivered by Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.
2. ASSAILING the judgment and order dated 12th March, 2007 passed by the learned trial Judge in W.P. No. 22082 (W) of 2005, this appeal has been preferred.
The impugned order reads such:
"12.3.2007.- These three petitioners have prayed for the issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding upon the Respondents to cancel the Written Tests which were held on 04.09.2005 for considering the promotions of the Clerks to the Officer Cadre in Scale –
1. The petitioners have further prayed for the issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondent to hold fresh Written Tests through an experienced and professional outside Agency in compliance with the Rules. The Petitioners have also prayed for cancellation of the panel of those candidates who have been shown to have qualified in the Written Tests and also to quash the entire process relating to the said Written Tests.
2. The facts, briefly stated, are that the Petitioner No. 1 joined as a junior Clerk-cum-Cashier in the Nadia Gamin Bank in 1984. He is now presently posted at the Rautari Branch. The petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.