SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Cal) 719

PRATAP KUMAR RAY, MD.ABDUL GHANI
Pradip Chourasia – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Satyqjit Talukdar, Arindam Sen, Bappaditya Sen

JUDGMENT

Pratap Kumar Ray, J.

1. HEARD the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

2. ASSAILING the order dated 23rd March, 2011 passed by the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal, Fourth Bench, in O. A. 3166 of 2010 (LRTT), this writ application has been filed.

The impugned order reads such. (Quoted from the certified copy of the impugned order).

"Case No. O.A. 3166 of 2010 (LRTT) 23.03.11 Learned Counsel for the applicants is present. The Learned Government Representative is present. Learned Counsels Bappaditya Sen and Kakali Ghosh filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No.5 and 6. Let the same be kept with the record. The application dated 22.12.2010 under section 10 read with section 6 of the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal Act, 1997 filed by the applicants praying for cancelling the notice dated 16.12.2010 (vide annexure 'p' to the original application) issued by the respondent No.3 B.L. and L.R.O. Matigara, District-Darjeeling is taken up for hearing on the point of admission. Perused the instant original application. Heard the Learned Counsel for the applicants and Learned Government Representative. Learned Government Representative submits b







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top