SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Cal) 681

PATHERYA
Krishna Rana – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Saurav Banerji, Sariful Islam Mallick, Chameli Majumdar, Swarup Pal, Jayanti Dhar Quader, Madhumita Dutta

JUDGMENT

PATHERYA, J.

1. THE petitioner seeks to challenge the residence criteria in the advertisement dated 6th August, 2008 for appointment of Auxiliary Nurse-cum- Midwife as ultra-vires the Constitution of India.

2. THE case of the petitioner is that one of the criteria for appointment of Auxiliary Nurse cum Midwife (ANM) is that the applicant has to be local resident of the Health Sub-Center. The said criteria is hit by Articles 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution of India. Article 16(3) of the Constitution of India postulates enactment of legislation and no restriction can be imposed by a mere notification. The notification dated 5th September, 2006 has been issued by the State and incorporates the criteria of local resident. This cannot be found in the National Rural Health Mission Scheme, (Scheme) which has been introduced by the Central Government. As the State notification is de-hors an enactment, the same is violative of the Constitution of India and liable to be set aside. Reliance is placed on AIR 2002 SC 2897, AIR 1970 SC 422, 2002 (6) SCC 562. Section 16(1) of the Constitution of India has granted equality for "employment" and "appointment" to any office under the State.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top