SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 1075

PRASENJIT MANDAL
Basudeb Dey – Appellant
Versus
Swati Dey – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Amalesh Roy, Satyajit Talukdar

JUDGMENT

Prasenjit Mandal, J.

1. THIS application is at the instance of the defendant and is directed against the order no.28 dated August 13, 2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Siliguri in Money Suit No.44 of 2005 thereby allowing an application under Order 22 Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. THE short fact is that the original plaintiff filed the Money Suit No.44 of 2005 for damages for malicious prosecution and defamation. In that suit, the plaintiff contended that the defendant filed a petition of complaint which contained certain allegations which were false and incorrect and that the defendant filed the said petition of complaint maliciously and to defame the plaintiff in the eyes of the public, his colleagues and friends. The plaintiff filed the said money suit claiming Rs.50,00,000/- for damages / compensation for defamation of the plaintiff by instituting a false case maliciously. Subsequently, the plaintiff died on June 22, 2008 leaving the opposite parties as his legal heirs. Thereafter, the opposite parties filed an application under Order 22 Rule 3 of the C.P.C. for substitution of the names of the plaintiffs in place of the deceased orig






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top