SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Cal) 127

RAGHUNATH RAY
Samita Saha – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Saha – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Anup Ch.Chatterji, Asit Baran Ghosh, Sourav Chatterjee, K.A.Ahmed.

JUDGMENT

Raghunath Ray, J.

1. BY filing an application under section 401 and 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code the petitioner wife has sought to challenge the Judgment and Order dated 04.06.08 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Burdwan in Criminal Motion No. 108 of 2007 affirming the judgment and order dated 26.09.2007 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 6th Court, Burdwan in Misc. Case No. 212 of 2005 whereby she has rejected the petitioner's claim for maintenance from the opposite party husband.

2. BACKGROUND facts leading to filing of this revisional application may be capsulised as under: An application under section 125 Cr PC was filed by the petitioner wife claiming maintenance @ Rs. 2000/- p.m. on the ground that she has been abused and tortured by her husband and in-laws since their further dowry demand could not be satisfied by her mother. The marriage between her and the O.P. husband was solemnized in accordance with Hindu Religious Rights on 09.08.04 and such solemnisation of marriage was also preceded by registration of their marriage on 07.04.04. It is, further, contended by her that she is unable to maintain herself while her husband ha



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top