J.N.PATEL, ASHIM KUMAR ROY, KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA, B.BHATTACHARYA, PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
Sudip Sen – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
J.N.Patel, J.
1. HEARD the learned counsel for the parties. These matters have come to be placed before this Bench of five Judges by reason of an order passed by a three-Judge Bench on 04.08.2010 pursuant to a reference made by the Division Bench of this Court while dealing with group of applications which felt that the decision of this Court rendered by the Full Bench in the case of Maya Rani Guin and etc. vs. State of West Bengal [(2003) Cri L.J. 1] needs reconsideration. The Full Bench after examining the issue thought it appropriate that the matter is referred to a Bench of five-
2. WE have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The Division Bench while dealing with group of applications C.R.M. No. 5123 of 2010 Sri Sudip Sen vs. The State of West Bengal with C.R.M. No. 4559 of 2010 Sri Suman Saha @ Kousik Saha vs. State of West Bengal and Ors. with C.R.M. No. 4457 of 2010 Jayanta Deb vs. The State of West Bengal, wherein the lead application is that of Sri Sudip Sen, seeking pre-arrest bail, are of the view that the decision of this Court rendered by the Full Bench in the case of Maya Rani Guin and etc. vs. State of West Bengal (2003) Cri L.J. 1, needs reconsideratio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.